<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED QUEST &#187; toxic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/toxic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest</link>
	<description>Explore science, nature and environment stories from Northern California and beyond with KQED’s multimedia series</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://science.kqed.org/quest/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Producer&#039;s Notes: Mercury in San Francisco Bay</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/10/06/producers-notes-mercury-in-san-francisco-bay/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/10/06/producers-notes-mercury-in-san-francisco-bay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Kass</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[almaden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold rush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total maximum daily load]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=3375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because there wasn't time in the QUEST TV segment on mercury in the bay to include information on safe fish eating practices, below are the guidelines, along with web links, to help you get plenty of Omega 3s and still keep your mercury levels low.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/video/mercury-in-the-bay"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2009/10/blog_mercury.jpeg" alt="" /></a><em>Mercury is a poisonous metallic element that is liquid at room temperature.</em></span></p>
<p>There's nothing like producing a controversial story on some favorite food group to have a profound effect on one's appetite. I gave up chicken after doing a story on factory farms (I already didn't eat beef or pork or I would have eliminated those as well.) Now, fish, too, has fallen from grace. Ignorance was bliss.</p>
<p>I've known for quite some time that some fish, especially tuna, were high in mercury. But discovering the extent of the problem, and that halibut and sea bass were also on the “do not eat too much of” list, was eye-opening for me. Now I count fish servings like some people count calories. Japanese cuisine, one of my favorites, has lost some of its glow, as well as its frequency in my dining-out plans. </p>
<p>Many of you have practical questions, as did I. How big a crimp does this have to put in my diet? How much is too much? How often is too often? Can I still enjoy that tuna sashimi and not worry about mercury overload? </p>
<p>Because there wasn't time in the QUEST TV segment on mercury in the bay to include information on safe fish eating practices, below are the guidelines, along with web links, to help you get plenty of Omega 3s and still keep your mercury levels low.</p>
<p>Here's what California's <a href="http://oehha.ca.gov/fish/general/sfbaydelta.html">Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment</a> says about eating fish from the San Francisco Bay and Delta Region. </p>
<ul class="links">
<li>Women beyond childbearing age and men should eat no more than two meals per month of San Francisco Bay sport fish, including sturgeon and striped bass caught in the delta. (One meal for an adult is about eight ounces). </li>
<li>Women beyond childbearing age and men should not eat any striped bass over 35 inches.</li>
<li>Women of childbearing age, pregnant, nursing mothers, and children should not eat more than one meal of Bay fish per month. In addition, they should not eat any striped bass over 27 inches or any shark.</li>
<li>This advisory does not apply to salmon, anchovies, herring, and smelt caught in the bay; other sport fish caught in the delta or ocean; or commercial fish.</li>
<li>Richmond Harbor Channel area: In addition to the above advice, no one should eat any croakers, surfperches, bullheads, gobies or shellfish taken within the Richmond Harbor Channel area because of high levels of chemicals detected there.</li>
<p>Here’s a summary of the <a href="http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/fish/advice/factsheet.html">joint fish advisory</a> published by the FDA and EPA for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or may become pregnant and for children. This is a general advisory not exclusive to any water body.</p>
</p>
<li>Do not eat Shark, Swordfish, King Mackerel, or Tilefish because they contain high levels of mercury.</li>
<li>Eat up to 12 ounces (2 average meals) a week of a variety of fish and shellfish that are lower in mercury. Five of the most commonly eaten fish that are low in mercury are shrimp, canned light tuna, salmon, pollock, and catfish.</li>
<li>Another commonly eaten fish, albacore ("white") tuna has more mercury than canned light tuna. So, when choosing your two meals of fish and shellfish, eat only up to 6 ounces (one average meal) of albacore tuna per week.</li>
<li>Check local advisories about the safety of fish caught by family and friends in your local lakes, rivers, and coastal areas. If no advice is available, eat up to 6 ounces (one average meal) per week of fish you catch from local waters, but don't consume any other fish during that week.</li>
<li>Follow these same recommendations when feeding fish and shellfish to your young child, but serve smaller portions.</li>
<p>Also, check for local advisories for each water body in <a href="http://oehha.ca.gov/fish/so_cal/index.html">California</a> that has fish consumption guidelines. They vary by water body.</p>
<p>And lastly, here’s some practical advice from Dr. Jane Hightower, the medical doctor who we feature in the mercury story.</p>
<li><i>“If you’re genetically susceptible, it’s really important to know that if you are an autoimmune-prone patient, Lupus, MS, thyroiditis, these kinds of things, then you should not consume mercury on a regular basis or at all. … And then the cardiac patients. You know, mercury can cause a reaction in vessels that leads to inflammation. So you want to have your Omega 3 fatty acids, which is anti-inflammatory. And not have mercury which is pro-inflammatory…. If you want to avoid significant mercury and you just don’t know what the mercury content is in the fish, a rule of thumb is to eat the small fish. Not a piece of the fish. If it comes in a steak, you want to know how big the fish was that the steak came from. You want the whole fish to fit on your plate. Don’t buy a bigger plate. Get a smaller fish. With the exception of salmon. Salmon can have elevated mercury, but very rarely.”</li>
<p></i></p>
<p>Good luck, good health, and and watch out for bones!</p>
<p><br clear="all"></p>
<p><span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/video/mercury-in-san-francisco-bay"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/tv_icon_light.gif" alt="" /></a></span>Watch the <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/video/mercury-in-san-francisco-bay">Mercury in San Francisco Bay</a> television story online.</p>
<p><br clear="all"></p>
<p> 37.8627 -122.318</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/almaden/" title="almaden" rel="tag">almaden</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/gold-rush/" title="gold rush" rel="tag">gold rush</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/mercury/" title="mercury" rel="tag">mercury</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/mining/" title="mining" rel="tag">mining</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/poison/" title="poison" rel="tag">poison</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/pollution/" title="pollution" rel="tag">pollution</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/total-maximum-daily-load/" title="total maximum daily load" rel="tag">total maximum daily load</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/toxic/" title="toxic" rel="tag">toxic</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/10/06/producers-notes-mercury-in-san-francisco-bay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.8627000 -122.3180000</georss:point><geo:lat>37.8627000</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.3180000</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2009/10/blog_mercury.jpeg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2009/10/blog_mercury.jpeg" medium="image" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/tv_icon_light.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporter&#039;s Notes: Drugs In Our Drinking Water</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/07/11/reporters-notes-drugs-in-our-drinking-water/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/07/11/reporters-notes-drugs-in-our-drinking-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 02:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Standen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[drinking water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kqed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa clara valley water district]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCVWD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teliosis institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's tricky to talk about pharmaceuticals in the drinking water without risking two really unfortunate side effects: 1) Make people panic that their tap water is unsafe. 2) Send listeners running to Costco to buy pallet-loads of overpriced, highly packaged, and often dubiously-sourced bottled water. You can never really say enough about everything that's wrong [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/drugs-in-our-drinking-water"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/07/radio2-40_drugs_water3001.jpg" /></a></span>It's tricky to talk about pharmaceuticals in the drinking water without risking two really unfortunate side effects: 1) Make people panic that their tap water is unsafe. 2) Send listeners running to Costco to buy pallet-loads of overpriced, highly packaged, and often dubiously-sourced bottled water.</p>
<p>You can never really say enough about <a href="http://www.pacinst.org/topics/water_and_sustainability/bottled_water/bottled_water_and_energy.html">everything that's wrong with bottled water </a>(which, by the way, adheres to lower safety standards than what comes out of your tap-– sorry, couldn’t resist!). But when it comes to drugs in the water, what strikes me as most interesting is what we know the least about: What do these tiny, tiny amounts of drugs mean to us humans?</p>
<p>"<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracelsus">The dose makes the poison</a>" is a mantra I hear constantly from public health experts (as well as my editors)– and it's worth considering. In other words: just because something exists does not mean it's affecting you. It's likely we're exposed to far more toxins in the act of, say, applying nail polish, or pumping a tank of gas, than we'll imbibe over a lifetime of drinking tap water. But it'll be interesting to watch this play out over the next decade or so, as scientists on all sides of the debate try and figure out what exactly effect our environment-– pharmaceuticals, nail polish, plastics, and countless other everyday substances&#8211; is having on us.</p>
<p><br clear="all" /><br />
<span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/drugs-in-our-drinking-water"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/radio_icon_light.gif" alt="" /></a></span><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/drugs-in-our-drinking-water">Listen to the Drugs In Our Drinking Water Radio report</a> online.<br />
<br clear="all" /></p>
<p> 37.248999 -121.874981</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/drinking-water/" title="drinking water" rel="tag">drinking water</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/drugs/" title="drugs" rel="tag">drugs</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/epa/" title="epa" rel="tag">epa</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/health/" title="Health" rel="tag">Health</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/jim-scott/" title="Jim Scott" rel="tag">Jim Scott</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/kqed/" title="kqed" rel="tag">kqed</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/monitoring/" title="monitoring" rel="tag">monitoring</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/pharmaceuticals/" title="pharmaceuticals" rel="tag">pharmaceuticals</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/safety/" title="safety" rel="tag">safety</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/santa-clara-valley-water-district/" title="santa clara valley water district" rel="tag">santa clara valley water district</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/scvwd/" title="SCVWD" rel="tag">SCVWD</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/teliosis-institute/" title="teliosis institute" rel="tag">teliosis institute</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/toxic/" title="toxic" rel="tag">toxic</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/water/" title="water" rel="tag">water</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/07/11/reporters-notes-drugs-in-our-drinking-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.2489990 -121.8749810</georss:point><geo:lat>37.2489990</geo:lat><geo:long>-121.8749810</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/07/radio2-40_drugs_water3001.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/07/radio2-40_drugs_water3001.jpg" medium="image" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/radio_icon_light.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relaxing the rules on toxic reporting</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2007/04/26/relaxing-the-rules-on-toxic-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2007/04/26/relaxing-the-rules-on-toxic-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Gorn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kqed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kqedquest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QUEST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2007/04/26/relaxing-the-rules-on-toxic-reporting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past two decades, U.S. factories that put toxic chemicals into the air and water had to report them, in detail, to the federal government and the public. The Bush Administration recently lowered those requirements by rewriting Environmental Protection Agency rules. That means, in California alone, as much as 6-hundred thousand pounds of toxic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/view/271"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/imp/radio13_pollution300.jpg" /></a></span>For the past two decades, U.S. factories that put toxic chemicals into the air and water had to report them, in detail, to the federal government and the public.  The Bush Administration recently lowered those requirements by rewriting Environmental Protection Agency rules.  That means, in California alone, as much as 6-hundred thousand pounds of toxic chemicals could go under-reported this year.  David Gorn reporting for QUEST radio has more.</p>
<p><span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/view/271"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/radio_icon_light.gif" /></span></a>You may <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/view/271">listen to the "Relaxing the Rules on Toxic Reporting" Radio report</a> online, as well as find additional links and resources.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/epa/" title="epa" rel="tag">epa</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/kqed/" title="kqed" rel="tag">kqed</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/kqedquest/" title="kqedquest" rel="tag">kqedquest</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/pollution/" title="pollution" rel="tag">pollution</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/quest/" title="QUEST" rel="tag">QUEST</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/science/" title="Science" rel="tag">Science</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/toxic/" title="toxic" rel="tag">toxic</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2007/04/26/relaxing-the-rules-on-toxic-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/imp/radio13_pollution300.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/imp/radio13_pollution300.jpg" medium="image" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/radio_icon_light.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

