<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED QUEST &#187; organic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/organic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest</link>
	<description>Explore science, nature and environment stories from Northern California and beyond with KQED’s multimedia series</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:37:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://science.kqed.org/quest/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Herbicides: Help or Harm?</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/07/20/herbicides-help-or-harm/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/07/20/herbicides-help-or-harm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Skene</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weeds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science.kqed.org/quest/?p=20811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent headlines have brought to light some of herbicides’ unintended effects. Herbicides can provide farmers and gardeners with advantages over unwanted weeds—but they also come with drawbacks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_20815" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/07/herbicides.jpg" rel="lightbox[20811]" title="herbicides"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/07/herbicides-300x169.jpg" alt="" title="herbicides" width="300" height="169" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-20815" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Applying herbicides to crops helps increase yield—but at a cost. Photo: tpmartins.</p></div>
<p>Recent <a href="http://ksjtracker.mit.edu/2011/07/15/lots-of-small-ink-then-nytimes-dupont-is-in-hot-water-with-landscapers-new-lawn-herbicide-mows-down-trees/">headlines</a> have brought to light some of herbicides’ unintended effects. The herbicide Imprelis, primarily used on golf courses and the like, has been <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/science/earth/15herbicide.html?_r=1">linked to the death of conifers</a> throughout the east and the midwest. The safety of the widely used herbicide Roundup has also been called into question. Herbicides can provide farmers and gardeners with advantages over unwanted weeds—but they also come with drawbacks.</p>
<p>When DuPont first introduced the herbicide Imprelis in 2010, it was seen as a pretty environmentally friendly option. It is really effective at preventing the growth of weeds like dandelions and ivy. It affects plants’ hormone receptors, and it works at low concentrations. Unlike other herbicides, hot temperatures or rainfall just after application do not make Imprelis ineffective—a benefit for lawn care professionals, who otherwise have to time the application of herbicides according to the weather report. But Imprelis doesn’t bind to the soil and can leach into groundwater, two reasons why the state of New York has not approved it. (California has not approved it either.) Because of these characteristics, the herbicide being taken up by nearby trees through their root systems. As a result, conifers’ needles turn brown, and some trees die. The chemicals in Imprelis stick around in the grass clippings, creating <a href="http://www.motherearthnews.com/grow-it/imprelis-killer-compost-zb0z11zrog.aspx">killer compost</a> that should go to the landfill rather than the compost bin or mulch pile. We haven’t heard the end of the story of Imprelis.</p>
<p>We will likely also hear more about Roundup, a big player manufactured by Monsanto. This <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/24/roundup-scientists-birth-defects_n_883578.html">story</a> in the Huffington Post describes several studies that indicate that the herbicide causes birth defects. Roundup and other similar herbicides contain glyphosate, which causes reproductive problems in adult animals and birth defects in animals’ offspring. Organisms like rabbits can be exposed when herbicides are applied and when they eat the plants that have been treated. Lab studies have shown that exposure to glyphosate results in malformations in frog and chicken embryos. And, lab studies show that Roundup also poses problems for human embryonic and placental cells. Herbicides that contain glyphosate are hugely popular, because they’re so effective. In the last year for which data are available, 2006-2007, the US agricultural industry applied 180 to 185 million pounds of glyphosate. From 2005 to 2007, non-agricultural use added another 8 to 11 million pounds to the ecosystem. This chemical is increasingly ingrained in the US agricultural system: farmers purchase genetically modified seeds that are resistant to Roundup (such as Roundup Ready Soybeans), and then spray Roundup on the crops. These methods allow for much higher crop yields than organic agriculture, and are cost-effective for big farms. Without the advantages that herbicides provide, farms cannot compete. </p>
<p>Eradicating weeds is a challenge, and herbicides are a big part of fighting that battle. We have a complex relationship with weeds—check out this <a href="http://www.sciencefriday.com/program/archives/201107156">great conversation about weeds</a> on <a href="http://www.sciencefriday.com/">Science Friday</a> last week. Herbicides give us some key advantages over unwanted weeds. These advantages come with drawbacks. The two herbicides under question are primarily used by industry—lawn care professionals and big ag farmers—rather than individuals. But the average citizen uses herbicides on his or her home lawn, too. Do you use herbicides? Why or why not? </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/agriculture/" title="agriculture" rel="tag">agriculture</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/herbicide/" title="herbicide" rel="tag">herbicide</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/herbicides/" title="herbicides" rel="tag">herbicides</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/organic/" title="organic" rel="tag">organic</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/plant/" title="plant" rel="tag">plant</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/plants/" title="plants" rel="tag">plants</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/weed/" title="weed" rel="tag">weed</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/weeds/" title="weeds" rel="tag">weeds</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/07/20/herbicides-help-or-harm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.879329 -122.2463347</georss:point><geo:lat>37.879329</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.2463347</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/07/herbicides.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/07/herbicides.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">herbicides</media:title>
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/07/herbicides.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">herbicides</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">Applying herbicides to crops helps increase yield—but at a cost. Photo: tpmartins.</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/07/herbicides-300x169.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prince Charles Delivers Landmark Speech, Says Sustainable Farming Can Feed The World</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/05/13/prince-charles-delivers-landmark-speech-says-sustainable-farming-can-feed-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/05/13/prince-charles-delivers-landmark-speech-says-sustainable-farming-can-feed-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darya Pino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince of Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=14489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prince Charles is a long-time supporter of organic and sustainable farming, but this speech took his advocacy a step further.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/05/pc2.jpg" alt="tectonic tremor at Parkfield" class="alignleft size-full" /><em></em>&lt;/span</p>
<p>Last week, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/editors-note-on-the-future-of-food-conference/2011/05/09/AFEmnojG_story_1.html">The Future of Food Conference</a> was held at Georgetown University, where thought leaders from around the world discussed the trends in food and agriculture that will shape our future.</p>
<p>Speakers included U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, author and filmmaker <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Schlosser">Eric Schlosser</a>, and poet <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendell_Berry">Wendell Berry</a>. Yet the most surprising and memorable speech was made by the Prince of Wales on the crucial need for the world agriculture industries to adopt sustainable farming practices for the sake of global health and economic security.</p>
</p>
<p>Prince Charles is a <a href="http://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/personalprofiles/residences/highgrove/homefarm/">long-time supporter of organic and sustainable farming</a>, but this speech took his advocacy a step further, urging government officials and global agriculture industries to re-evaluate the current food structure in favor of more sustainable practices in order to secure the resilience of our planet as well as our global economy.</p>
<p>“Questioning the conventional world view is a risky business. And the only reason I have done so is for the sake of your generation and for the integrity of Nature herself.”</p>
<p>The prince painted a grim picture of the current food system, arguing that it is depleting our resources and weakening our food system and economies at unprecedented rates.</p>
<p>“In the U.S., soil is being washed away ten times faster than the Earth can replenish it, and it is happening forty times faster in China and India. Twenty-two thousand square miles of arable land is turning into desert every year and, all told, it appears a quarter of the world’s farmland, two billion acres, is degraded.”</p>
<p>He also questioned our dependence on non-renewable resources as an Achilles' heel in our ability to continue to feed the world's growing population. This is contrasted to the growing obesity epidemic and deteriorating health of develped nations.</p>
<p>“Most forms of industrialized agriculture now have an umbilical dependency on oil, natural gas and other non-renewable resources. One study I have read estimates that a person today on a typical Western diet is, in effect, consuming nearly a U.S. gallon of diesel every day.”</p>
<p>“Over a billion people – one seventh of the world’s population – are hungry and another billion suffer from what is called “hidden hunger,” which is the lack of essential vitamins and nutrients in their diets. And on the reverse side of the coin, let us not forget the other tragic fact – that over a billion people in the world are now considered overweight or obese. It is an increasingly insane picture.”</p>
<p>The critical factor and cornerstone of the economic prosperity, according to Prince Charles, is the health and diversity of the top soil, which he calls “the planet's most vital renewable resource.” Though this is an idea frequently promoted by organic farming advocates, rarely if ever has such nuanced understanding of the importance of natural ecosystems been uttered by such prominent political figures.</p>
<p>“Top soil is the cornerstone of the prosperity of nations. It acts as a buffer against drought and as a carbon sink and it is the primary source of the health of all animals, plants and people.”</p>
<p>He goes on to explain that not only is sustainable farming necessary for the health of the planet and our economy, but that it can help create a more resilient global food system, directly challenging the popular mantra that organic agriculture cannot produce enough food to feed the planet.</p>
<p>“Having myself tried to farm as sustainably as possible for some twenty-six years in England&#8230;I certainly know of plenty of current evidence that adopting an approach which mirrors the miraculous ingenuity of Nature can produce surprisingly high yields of a wide range of vegetables, arable crops, beef, lamb and milk. And yet we are told ceaselessly that sustainable or organic agriculture cannot feed the world. I find this claim very hard to understand. Especially when you consider the findings of an impeccably well-researched International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development, conducted in 2008 by the U.N.”</p>
<p>The report “drew on evidence from more than 400 scientists worldwide and concluded that small-scale, family-based farming systems, adopting so-called agro-ecological approaches, were among the most productive systems in developing countries.”</p>
<p>Prince Charles goes on to explain that the reason sustainable farming has not so far had great success in industrial societies is because of a “system of farm subsidies geared in such a way that it favours overwhelmingly those kinds of agricultural techniques that are responsible for the many problems I have just outlined,” and “the cost of that damage is not factored into the price of food production.”</p>
<p>“This has led to a situation where farmers are better off using intensive methods and where consumers who would prefer to buy sustainably produced food are unable to do so because of the price. There are many producers and consumers who want to do the right thing but, as things stand, “doing the right thing” is penalised.”</p>
<p>The prince address the political ramifications of this directly.</p>
<p>“Nobody wants food prices to go up, but if it is the case that the present low price of intensively produced food in developed countries is actually an illusion, only made possible by transferring the costs of cleaning up pollution or dealing with human health problems onto other agencies, then could correcting these anomalies result in a more beneficial arena where nobody is actually worse off in net terms?”</p>
<p>Ultimately he recommends developed nations change the way they think and approach food systems entirely.</p>
<p>“This all depends upon us deepening our understanding of the relationship between food, energy, water and economic security, and then creating policies which reward producers who base their farming systems on these principles.”</p>
<p>He also suggests that rather than hurting economic systems and agriculture industries, which is often suggested as a reason organic, sustainable agriculture cannot be expanded to a global scale, he explains that sustainable farming is in fact required for the strength of our economy.</p>
<p>“Capitalism depends upon capital, but our capital ultimately depends upon the health of Nature’s capital. Whether we like it or not, the two are in fact inseparable&#8230;. We need to include in the bottom line the true costs of food production – the true financial costs and the true costs to the Earth.”</p>
<p>“If we are to make our agricultural and marine systems (and therefore our economies) resilient in the long term, then we have to design policies in every sector that bring the true costs of environmental destruction and the depletion of natural capital to the fore and support an ecosystem based approach.”</p>
<p>The entire speech can be <a href="http://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/speechesandarticles/a_speech_by_hrh_the_prince_of_wales_to_the_future_for_food_c_848967946.html">read here</a>.</p>
<p> 38.8980596 -77.012154</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/agriculture/" title="agriculture" rel="tag">agriculture</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/food/" title="food" rel="tag">food</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/global-health/" title="global health" rel="tag">global health</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/organic/" title="organic" rel="tag">organic</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/prince-charles/" title="Prince Charles" rel="tag">Prince Charles</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/prince-of-wales/" title="Prince of Wales" rel="tag">Prince of Wales</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/sustainable/" title="sustainable" rel="tag">sustainable</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/05/13/prince-charles-delivers-landmark-speech-says-sustainable-farming-can-feed-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/05/pc2.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/05/pc2.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">pc</media:title>
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/05/pc2.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tectonic tremor at Parkfield</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Conventional Produce Lower Your Child&#039;s IQ?</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/04/29/will-conventional-produce-lower-your-childs-iq/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/04/29/will-conventional-produce-lower-your-childs-iq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darya Pino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[produce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=14136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While these women had slightly higher than average pesticide exposure due to their proximity to farming centers, their levels were not out of range of national averages.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/04/pesticides2.jpg" alt="" /></a><em>Pregnant mothers with the highest exposure to pesticides had kids with lower IQ at age 7. Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/52890443@N02/4889435516/">C. G. P. Grey</a>.</em></span></p>
<p>Three studies <a href="http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/25403">published last week</a> in <em>Environmental Health Perspectives</em> concluded that pesticide exposure in pregnant women is linked to lower IQ scores in their children at age 7. This is pretty scary news for expectant mothers, but what does it mean practically?</p>
<p>Pesticide exposure can come in many forms. In one of the studies done at UC Berkeley, scientists estimated pesticide exposure in the agricultural town of Salinas (Monterey County, CA) by measuring <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organophosphate">organophosphate</a> metabolites in the mother's urine during and after pregnancy. While these women had slightly higher than average pesticide exposure due to their proximity to farming centers, their levels were not out of range of national averages.</p>
</p>
<p>Interestingly, the effect of pesticide exposure on intelligence was only significant before birth; childhood exposure to pesticides did not appear to have an impact on intelligence scores.</p>
<p>The other two studies were conducted in more urban environments in New York City. In these studies done by researchers at Mount Sinai Medical Center and Columbia University, pesticide exposure was determined by measuring either urine metabolites or umbilical cord levels of the pesticide chlorpyrifos, respectively. Intelligence scores were significantly lower in children whose mothers had been exposed to the most pesticides while pregnant, indicating that these results are consistent across populations and not limited to farming communities.</p>
<p>In urban populations, pesticide exposure often comes from eating crops that have been treated with pesticides. People can also come into contact with pesticides in home gardens, schools and other public buildings with landscaping.</p>
<p>The good news is that use of organophosphate pesticides have declined steadily over the past decade, declining approximately 50 percent since 2001. Also, though choosing organic produce will help decrease pesticide exposure through food, consumers shouldn't feel they need to switch to 100% organic to protect their children.</p>
<p>Every year the <a href="http://www.foodnews.org/walletguide.php">Environmental Working Group</a> publishes the “Dirty Dozen,” a list of the conventional produce likely to contain the highest amount of pesticides. It also publishes a list of the cleanest conventional foods, “The Clean 15,” with the lowest pesticide levels. The researchers found that the impact of pesticides on intelligence scores is dose dependent, meaning any reduction in exposure can be beneficial.</p>
<p>While making these decisions it is important to realize that eating a wide variety of fresh fruits and vegetables is one of the most important thing you can do for the health of your developing baby. You should not drastically restrict the different kinds of produce you consume while pregnant. Being smart about which organic foods you purchase, and carefully washing the conventional produce you continue to buy can make a big impact on your exposure.</p>
<p><em>Are you worried about pesticide exposure? How do you handle it?</em></p>
<p> 37.87241 -122.259616</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/children/" title="children" rel="tag">children</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/conventional/" title="conventional" rel="tag">conventional</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/intelligence/" title="intelligence" rel="tag">intelligence</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/organic/" title="organic" rel="tag">organic</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/pesticides/" title="pesticides" rel="tag">pesticides</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/pregnancy/" title="pregnancy" rel="tag">pregnancy</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/produce/" title="produce" rel="tag">produce</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/04/29/will-conventional-produce-lower-your-childs-iq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.8724100 -122.2596160</georss:point><geo:lat>37.8724100</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.2596160</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/04/pesticides2.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/04/pesticides2.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2006-08-15 - Road Trip - Day 23 - United States - California - S</media:title>
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/04/pesticides2.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mastodons, Mummies, and Meteorites:  Evidence of Life Out There?</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/03/11/mastodons-mummies-and-meteorites-evidence-of-life-out-there/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/03/11/mastodons-mummies-and-meteorites-evidence-of-life-out-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burress</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrobiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbonaceous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chondrite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CI1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hoover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=12701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent publishing of the investigation of a rare class of meteorite (the CI1 Carbonaceous Chondrite) by Dr. Richard Hoover of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center has caused another stir among scientists and the news media regarding possible origins of life on Earth and life in the Universe in general.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/03/hoover-chondrite.gif" /><em>Scanning electron microscope image of the Orgueil meteorite. <br />Credit: Dr. Richard Hoover/Journal of Cosmology<br /></em></span></p>
<p><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/2010/01/29/personal-comet/">The recent publication of the investigation of a rare class of meteorite (the CI1 <a href="http://www4.nau.edu/meteorite/Meteorite/Book-CarbChondrites.html">Carbonaceous Chondrite</a>) by Dr. Richard Hoover of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center has caused another stir among scientists and the news media regarding possible origins of life on Earth, and life in the Universe in general.  Exciting stuff—though the report stimulated the "usual" spectrum of responses, ranging from the starry-eyed <em>wow</em>! to the cool-headed<em> let's wait and see </em>to a tepid-at-best <em>we've <a href="http://www.space.com/11049-alien-life-meteorites-skepticism.html">heard this hype before</a>….</em></p>
<p>In a nutshell, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/03/05/exclusive-nasa-scientists-claims-evidence-alien-life-meteorite/">Dr. Hoover's study </a> suggests that encased within the minerals of the studied meteorites are chemical signatures of life and fossils of microbes, some of which are very similar to known Earthly cyanobacteria, and some that are not very like Earth life forms at all.  The implication is that life (at least these would-be meteoritic microbes) originated outside of Earth, on some other parent body—possibly a comet—and that the formation of life may be common and ubiquitous in the Universe. It's a very big implication—and as some respondents have cited, big implications require big proof (okay, I'm paraphrasing Carl Sagan's, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof").  </p>
<p>One of the challenges in this type of investigation is in distinguishing between "indigenous" mineral and microbe-like forms in the meteorites (that is, those that may have come along with the meteorite during its fall to Earth) and contamination by Earthly microbes—because, come on, if the Earth's surface is nothing else, it is absolutely teeming with life in every nook and cranny! </p>
<p>Other implications have been mentioned beside life from "out there" seeding the early Earth and giving rise to us (in fact, there is no definitive proof that life originated on Earth—and according to one theory, life could not have started here). </p>
<p>One idea goes the other way:  life started on Earth early on, prior to the end of the period of heavy bombardment of our world by asteroids and comets, and the blasts of some of those collisions could have kicked the Earthly specimens back into space…maybe only to return to us eons later as "evidence of extraterrestrial life"—which would be ironic.  </p>
<p>As part of his analysis, Dr. Hoover included a range of known Earth life as control references&#8211;samples from mastodons, Egyptian mummies, insects preserved in amber, fossilized cyanobacteria from ancient rocks, and several others—to compare to the samples from his subject meteorites.  According to his publication, the comparison of the samples has shown certain organic chemicals found in terrestrial life lacking in the meteorites—a number of amino acids, and nitrogen—which suggest that the meteorite samples may not bear contamination by Earthly life. </p>
<p>The quest for life beyond Earth has gone on for a long time, and a lot of tantalizing clues and possible evidence have been making the rounds.  Microbe fossils in <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/12/04/new-evidence-of-martian-life-found-in-antarctica/">meteorites from Mars</a>? <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/2010/12/03/arsenic-and-old-lakes-nasa-finds-life-not-as-we-know-it/">Life not-as-we-know-it </a>living in the waters of Mono Lake? <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/01/30/methane-on-mars-moooooooo/">Methane plumes </a>from beneath the Martian surface? Organic molecules in the tails of comets and on <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-06/new-cassini-findings-hint-methane-based-life-titan">Saturn's moon Titan</a>? And now, possible organics and fossils in the rarest of carbonaceous chondrite meteorites? </p>
<p>For the moment, I'll wait and see <a href="http://journalofcosmology.com/Life101.html">how scientists review </a>Dr. Hoover's study—because, yes, I have heard before what turned out to be hype—but in the back of my mind…wow!</p>
<p> 37.8148 -122.178</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/astrobiology/" title="astrobiology" rel="tag">astrobiology</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/astronomy/" title="Astronomy" rel="tag">Astronomy</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/carbonaceous/" title="carbonaceous" rel="tag">carbonaceous</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/chondrite/" title="chondrite" rel="tag">chondrite</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/ci1/" title="CI1" rel="tag">CI1</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/hoover/" title="hoover" rel="tag">hoover</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/life/" title="life" rel="tag">life</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/marshall/" title="marshall" rel="tag">marshall</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/meteorite/" title="meteorite" rel="tag">meteorite</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/nasa/" title="nasa" rel="tag">nasa</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/organic/" title="organic" rel="tag">organic</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/03/11/mastodons-mummies-and-meteorites-evidence-of-life-out-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.8148000 -122.1780000</georss:point><geo:lat>37.8148000</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.1780000</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/03/hoover-chondrite1.gif" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/03/hoover-chondrite1.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Orgueil meteorite scanning electron microscope image.</media:title>
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/03/hoover-chondrite.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chickens in the House</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2010/05/19/chickens-in-the-house/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2010/05/19/chickens-in-the-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gotliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2010/05/19/chickens-in-the-house/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raising chickens offers a good life for our feathered friends, a sense of peace, a connection to nature and our food source, eggs with high nutritional value, a composting and fertilization system, free entertainment and another reason to rise and shine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2010/05/chickens-009-01.jpg" alt="" /></a><em>Raising chickens offers a good life for our feathered friends, a sense of peace, a connection to nature and our food source, eggs with high nutritional value, a composting and fertilization system, free entertainment and another reason to rise and shine. </em></span></p>
<p>I appreciate a good, hearty, hot, nutritious and deep yellow omelet. I like humane treatment of animals.  When trying to marry these two passions, however, I find myself in an internal struggle. Finding a resource of egg-laying chickens where I am certain that the treatment is humane, cage free, free range and organic has proven a challenge. In my blog post, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/05/21/quest-for-a-kind-egg/">Quest for a Kind Egg</a>, I tried to get the straight dope.  I have also tried with desperation to check farm websites or have a decent conversation with the Egg Guy at the Lake Merritt Farmer’s Market, all with not luck. Finally, I was ready to up my quest. </p>
<p>How about raising chickens? What an original and radical idea. I launched a few investigative e-mails, wondering if anyone I knew could possibly be an urban chicken farmer. It turns out that all the cool kids are doing it. Responses flooded in from Oakland, San Francisco, Berkeley, Monterey, Point Reyes, and beyond, and I was off for some backyard coop adventures to catch up on the trend.</p>
<p>I paid a visit to Mike and Tasha and their three hens at their condo in Rockridge. I found their flock happily hanging in their home-made coop and condo backyard, doing some evening snacking. Tony was raised with chickens in Zimbabwe and went the chicken route because he finds them peaceful and entertaining to observe. He appreciates their free-range roaming of the yard and their innate ability to pull on grasses until they get the seeds. He loves that each chicken lays one egg a day, offering the family plenty of heavy, delicious eggs for eating and baking. He especially loves the way they announce their egg laying with a loud squawking performance and shout out. </p>
<p>Tasha appreciates the relationship she and her three year old daughter have with these gals. They recognize her, respond to her and add a nurturing dimension to her life. They also take care of the family compost as they peck away.</p>
<p>So, I concluded, raising chickens offers a good life for our feathered friends, a sense of peace, a connection to nature and our food source, eggs with high nutritional value, a composting and fertilization system, free entertainment and another reason to rise and shine.  No wonder there are so many eggheads out there and so many resources for them:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.backyardchickens.com/">BackYardChickens</a><br />
<a href="http://www.uas.coop/">Urban Alliance For Sustainability</a><br />
<a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/assignment_7&#038;id=6583109">Urban chicken trend on rise in Bay Area</a><br />
<a href="http://www.urbanchickens.net/">Urban Chickens Network</a></p>
<p>Also watch <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/video/city-egg-country-egg">City Egg, Country Egg on QUEST</a> to learn more about a study at UC Davis that compares store-bought eggs and farm fresh eggs.</p>
<p> 37.8427778 -122.2461111</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/chicken/" title="chicken" rel="tag">chicken</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/egg/" title="egg" rel="tag">egg</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/free-range/" title="free range" rel="tag">free range</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/humane/" title="humane" rel="tag">humane</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/organic/" title="organic" rel="tag">organic</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2010/05/19/chickens-in-the-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.8427778 -122.2461111</georss:point><geo:lat>37.8427778</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.2461111</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2010/05/chickens-009-01.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2010/05/chickens-009-01.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporter&#039;s Notes: The Politics of Green Wine</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/09/04/reporters-notes-the-politics-of-green-wine/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/09/04/reporters-notes-the-politics-of-green-wine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Kissack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kqedquest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[napa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vineyards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=3545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often look at the chemical ingredients in what I buy.  I shop at farmers markets for organic produce and use green cleaning supplies.  So, it caught me off guard when a friend remarked, "you are so aware of what you eat, why aren't you just as curious about what you drink?"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/the-politics-of-green-wine"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2009/09/radio3-47_ecowine300.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
<p>I often look at the chemical ingredients in what I buy.  I shop at farmers markets for organic produce and use green cleaning supplies.  So, it caught me off guard when a friend remarked, "you are so aware of what you eat, why aren't you just as curious about what you drink?"  Well, we drink organic coffee but not organic wine. I was worried about sacrificing taste and I just didn't think most vineyards were heavily sprayed with pesticides. Then I learned that wine grapes are the second most sprayed crop in the state. This didn't seem like it could be that good for the farm workers, the Earth, or the consumer. Several studies have found trace amounts of pesticides in wine. They may be at extremely low amounts, but what kind of impact could pesticide residues have overtime?</p>
<p>Armed with a new green cause, I set out to find more information about eco-wines. I learned that organic wine is just one type of green wine &#8212; there is also wine made with organic grapes.  It turns out I had been drinking some of these wines and enjoying them.  The thing is, you can't call it "organic wine" if the wine has added sulfites, a naturally occurring compound.  Most winemakers add sulfites to help preserve the wine and make it more stable. If a wine is made from organic grapes but contains sulfites, the world "organic" can only be mentioned as part of the ingredient claim on the back of the bottle.  No wonder I didn't know I was drinking wine farmed organically.</p>
<p>It turns out northern Sonoma County and Mendocino county are hotbeds for green wine.  In the course of reporting this story, I visited several of these wine makers.  <a href="http://www.bonterra.com" target="_blank">Bonterra Vineyards</a>, below Ukiah, has been farming organically since 1987 and now farms one of their ranches, McNab, biodynamically. Their red blend is nicely balanced and tastes very good.</p>
<p>Biodynamic is a novel form of organic farming practice with its roots in France.  A biodynamic vineyard is a self-sustaining ecosystem &#8212; making organic compost, removing chemicals from the soil and farming with the cycles of the Earth.  Biodynamic has its own <a href="http://www.demeter-usa.org/" target="_blank">international certification</a>. (<a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/imp/QUEST_Winery_Vineyard List.pdf">Here is a list</a> of their certified wines).  Just up the 101 from Bonterra is <a href="http://www.mendocinowinecompany.com/Parducci.html" target="_blank">Parducci Wine Cellars</a>.  This family run company is farming organic grapes and in some cases, biodynamically.  Parducci also claims to be one of the most sustainable wineries in the country.</p>
<p>Sustainable is a squishy term. Sustainable wineries may be running off solar power or doing creek restoration to save spawning salmon but they are not necessarily organic and they are not certified. However, the <a href="http://www.sustainablewinegrowing.org/" target="_blank">California Sustainable Winegrowing Program</a> is working toward an industry certification.  The idea is to raise the entire industry's practices and help vintners make more eco-friendly choices that often include using less chemicals in the vineyards.</p>
<p>Back to sulfites. This ended up being the main reason for the stigma still associated with green wine.  Twenty years ago, green wines were uneven and there were not that many choices.  Now, several of these eco-wines are winning high points from the industry. Organic wine can only contain naturally occurring sulfites, under 10ppm.  Wines farmed organically must keep the added sulfites below 100ppm.  Conventional wine can contain sulfites as high as 300ppm.  When I was reporting this story, several folks asked me if I was going to explain why they get headaches from red wine. Isn't it the sulfites?  Actually, it is not known why some people get headaches from drinking red wine. It could be the histamines.  It doesn't look like it's the sulfites.  Less than 1% of the population, according to the FDA, is sensitive to sulfites. The reaction is a respiratory one.</p>
<p>Anyway, if you enjoy wine, I encourage you to think beyond red and white but to consider green, too. To find out more, listen to our radio story and check out our links.  Also, green wine pioneer, <a href="http://www.pauldolanwine.com/index.php" target="_blank">Paul Dolan</a> together with Parducci has<a href="http://www.pauldolanwine.com/index.php/read-the-handbook-online" target="_blank"> created a green wine handbook</a> which is very helpful.</p>
<p><span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/the-politics-of-green-wine"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/radio_icon_light.gif" alt="" /></a></span><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/the-politics-of-green-wine">Listen to the The Politics of Green Wine</a> radio report online.</p>
<p><object classid="D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="620" height="534" id="soundslider"><param name="movie" value="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/imp/radio3-47_EcoWine/soundslider.swf?size=1&#038;format=xml" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/imp/radio3-47_EcoWine/soundslider.swf?size=1&#038;format=xml" quality="high" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" width="620" height="534" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></p>
<p> 39.197962 -123.207764</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/environment/" title="Environment" rel="tag">Environment</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/kqedquest/" title="kqedquest" rel="tag">kqedquest</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/napa/" title="napa" rel="tag">napa</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/organic/" title="organic" rel="tag">organic</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/pesticides/" title="pesticides" rel="tag">pesticides</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/radio/" title="Radio" rel="tag">Radio</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/sustainability/" title="sustainability" rel="tag">sustainability</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/vineyards/" title="vineyards" rel="tag">vineyards</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/wine/" title="wine" rel="tag">wine</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/09/04/reporters-notes-the-politics-of-green-wine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>39.1979620 -123.2077640</georss:point><geo:lat>39.1979620</geo:lat><geo:long>-123.2077640</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2009/09/radio3-47_ecowine300.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2009/09/radio3-47_ecowine300.jpg" medium="image" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/radio_icon_light.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science Event Pick: Gobble, Gobble&#8211; Science for Foodies</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/11/20/science-event-picks-gobble-gobble-%e2%80%93-science-for-foodies/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/11/20/science-event-picks-gobble-gobble-%e2%80%93-science-for-foodies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kishore Hari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael pollan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here in the Bay Area, we're known the world around as foodies, especially given the recent popularity of the Slow Food Festival. As we approach the biggest food holiday of the year, it's a great opportunity to think about the science behind all of these scrumptious meals.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/11/chickiechickie.jpg" /><em>Is this you in the kitchen?</em></span>Here in the Bay Area, we're known the world around as foodies, especially given the recent popularity of the <a href="http://www.slowfoodsanfrancisco.com/">Slow Food Festival</a>. As we approach the biggest food holiday of the year, it's a great opportunity to think about the science behind all of these scrumptious meals.</p>
<p>Last year, I stumbled across a new series of lectures on <a href="http://ethicsinsociety.stanford.edu/ethics-events/lectures-events/">Food Ethics &amp; Environment</a> at Stanford University. Headlining the series was the incomparable <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQPN1O03z8I">Michael Pollan</a>, who led an interactive discussion on <a href="../../../../../tag/michael-pollan/">the evolution of food culture</a> in the U.S. I was amazed at the level of passion in the audience and moreover the knowledge level of the audience. I left inspired to take my time with food and eat a little healthier (that worked for about a week).</p>
<p>This year, Stanford again delivers a stellar lineup. Over the next few weeks and months&#8211;  there will be discussions ranging from water, the affect of global warming on our food, fair trade coffee, and even a conversation with a organic farmer (it's Joel Salatin, one of the heroes from the "Omnivore's Dilemma").</p>
<p>So before you give thanks next week, consider a heaping serving of food science.</p>
<p>All events are free. They take place at the Annenberg Auditorium on the Stanford University Campus. The events are usually held on <strong>Thursday nights at 7pm</strong>. For more info, check out the <a href="http://ethicsinsociety.stanford.edu/ethics-events/lectures-events/">Stanford Ethics Website</a>.</p>
<p> 37.427731 -122.167595</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/eating/" title="eating" rel="tag">eating</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/ethics/" title="ethics" rel="tag">ethics</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/film/" title="film" rel="tag">film</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/food/" title="food" rel="tag">food</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/food-science/" title="food science" rel="tag">food science</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/lecture/" title="lecture" rel="tag">lecture</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/michael-pollan/" title="michael pollan" rel="tag">michael pollan</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/organic/" title="organic" rel="tag">organic</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/science-events/" title="science events" rel="tag">science events</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/stanford/" title="Stanford" rel="tag">Stanford</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/11/20/science-event-picks-gobble-gobble-%e2%80%93-science-for-foodies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.4277310 -122.1675950</georss:point><geo:lat>37.4277310</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.1675950</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/11/chickiechickie.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/11/chickiechickie.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporter&#039;s Notes&#058; Eating a Low&#045;Carbon Diet</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/06/13/reporters-notes-eating-a-lowcarbon-diet/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/06/13/reporters-notes-eating-a-lowcarbon-diet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Sommer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farmers market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kqed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kqedquest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not everyone would be excited about a box of 16 pounds of meat. But for the members of the Bay Area Meat CSA, the enthusiasm was off the charts. I took part in their spring share this year, where member of the CSA receive a monthly box of pork, poultry, lamb and beef from local [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/eating-a-low-carbon-diet"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/06/radio2-36_low_carbon_diet3001.jpg" alt="" /></a></span>Not everyone would be excited about a box of 16 pounds of meat. But for the members of the <a href="http://bamcsa.pbwiki.com/" target="_blank">Bay Area Meat CSA</a>, the enthusiasm was off the charts.  I took part in their spring share this year, where member of the CSA receive a monthly box of pork, poultry, lamb and beef from local Bay Area Farms. The idea began when blogger Bonnie Powell of <a href="http://www.ethicurean.com" target="_blank">The Ethicurean</a> put out a call to her readers. Many of them were already getting vegetable CSA's &#8211; a meat CSA seemed a logical step. Since then, Tamar Adler, a cook at Chez Panisse stepped in to help run it. And running it is no easy task. This past spring, they were distributing 1,000 pounds a month to members.</p>
<p>Since the CSA only buys whole animals, members get a few interesting things in each delivery. As Adler says, not every cut on an animal is a grill-able cut. Some cuts require other cooking techniques, and so members are challenged to do braises and stews with what they get. The idea is to create a new market for many of the local, small-scale producers. And Adler says she's been getting phone calls from many others looking to join.</p>
<p>Adler has decided the CSA will take the summer off, so she can work on restructuring it into a more cooperative model. As she says, one of the goals of the CSA is for consumers to connect with their producers and she's hoping the CSA's structure can reflect that. The good news is a number of other meat CSA's have arrived on the scene in the Bay Area for those of you looking to join one. Those are:</p>
<ul class="links">
<li><a href="http://www.clarksummitfarm.com/buy.html" target="_blank">The Clark Summit Meat Club</a></li>
<li><a href="http://groups.ucanr.org/LocalMeatProd/" target="_blank">Sonoma County Meat Buying Club</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.marinsunfarms.com/meatclub.html" target="_blank">Marin Sun Farms</a></li>
<li>And here's <a href="http://www.ethicurean.com/meat-csa/" target="_blank">a list of meat CSA's nationwide</a></li>
</ul>
<p>As I also discovered in this story, eating a low-carbon diet is not simple. Researchers are just starting to get a handle on the methodology used to do a life cycle analysis for food. And the news isn't good for meat and cheese lovers &#8211; it turns out red meat and dairy products have the highest carbon footprints. The further you dive into their life cycle, the more complicated it gets. Luckily, Gail Feenstra of UC Davis's Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program has a few simple tips to cut your carbon.</p>
<ul class="links">
<li>Eat less red meat and dairy</li>
<li>Avoid foods grown in heated greenhouses by eating seasonal food</li>
<li>Avoid food transported by air by eating locally</li>
<li>Consolidate your shopping into as few trips as possible</li>
<li>Waste less food. If it goes into a landfill, it emits the same gases as cows</li>
</ul>
<p>You can get a sense of the footprint of your diet through the Bon Appetit Management Company's <a href="http://www.eatlowcarbon.org/" target="_blank">Eat Low Carbon Calculator</a> or you can look up a local farmer's market with <a href="http://www.localharvest.org/" target="_blank">Local Harvest</a>.</p>
<p><span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/eating-a-low-carbon-diet"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/radio_icon_light.gif" alt="" /></a></span>You may <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/eating-a-low-carbon-diet">listen to "Eating a Low Carbon Diet" report</a> online, as well as find additional links and resources.</p>
<p> 37.882 -122.269</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/carbon/" title="carbon" rel="tag">carbon</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/carbon-footprint/" title="carbon footprint" rel="tag">carbon footprint</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/csas/" title="CSA&#039;s" rel="tag">CSA&#039;s</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/ecology/" title="ecology" rel="tag">ecology</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/energy/" title="energy" rel="tag">energy</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/farmers-market/" title="farmers market" rel="tag">farmers market</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/global-warming/" title="global warming" rel="tag">global warming</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/kqed/" title="kqed" rel="tag">kqed</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/kqedquest/" title="kqedquest" rel="tag">kqedquest</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/meat/" title="meat" rel="tag">meat</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/organic/" title="organic" rel="tag">organic</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/pbs/" title="pbs" rel="tag">pbs</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/public-radio/" title="public radio" rel="tag">public radio</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/radio/" title="Radio" rel="tag">Radio</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/06/13/reporters-notes-eating-a-lowcarbon-diet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.8820000 -122.2690000</georss:point><geo:lat>37.8820000</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.2690000</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/06/radio2-36_low_carbon_diet3001.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/06/radio2-36_low_carbon_diet3001.jpg" medium="image" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/radio_icon_light.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quest for a Kind Egg</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/05/21/quest-for-a-kind-egg/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/05/21/quest-for-a-kind-egg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gotliffe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cage free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chickens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debeaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diethylstilbestrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kqed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omega-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poultry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QUEST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2008/05/21/quest-for-a-kind-egg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, I love eggs: scrambled, poached, deviled, fried, boiled, and my favorite, egg in a basket. They are the perfect breakfast or power-ball snack. I also love the idea of purchasing eggs from farms that raise them with kindness and humanity, and that has proven a bit challenging. There are many terms to decipher, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/05/blog_egg.jpg" /></span>Yep, I love eggs: scrambled, poached, deviled, fried, boiled, and my favorite, egg in a basket.  They are the perfect breakfast or power-ball snack. I also love the idea of purchasing eggs from farms that raise them with kindness and humanity, and that has proven a bit challenging. There are many terms to decipher, but armed with correct information, we can all help chickens and still enjoy those eggs. The following chart gives information about a few local farms and is thanks to my favorite place to grocery shop, <a href="http://www.rainbowgrocery.coop/">Rainbow Grocery</a>.</p>
<p><br clear="all" /></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="70"><strong> </strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="46"><strong>Rock Island</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>Judy's   Family Farm</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="49"><strong>Uncle   Eddies</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="47"><strong>Chino</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Valley</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>Organic   Valley</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>Clover</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>Clover   Organic</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>Marin   Sun Farms</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>Eatwell   Farms</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>Clark</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Summit</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="70"><strong>Organic   Feed</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="46"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="49"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="47"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>yes</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="70"><strong>Hormones,   Antibiotics &amp; other additives in chicken feed</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="46"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="49"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="47"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>no</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="70"><strong>Kept   in Cages</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="46"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="49"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="47"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>no</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="70"><strong>Have   access to outside</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="46"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="49"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="47"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>yes</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="70"><strong>Beaks   clipped</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="46"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="49"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="47"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>yes</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>no</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="70"><strong>Forced   molted</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="46"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="49"><strong>no </strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="47"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="59"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="48"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>no</strong></td>
<td valign="top" width="58"><strong>no</strong></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong>Organic Fed / Certified Organic</strong></p>
<p>All organic eggs are certified by the USDA. Organic eggs come from hens whose feed is free of pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and commercial fertilizers. Organic chicken feed contains no animal byproducts and the hens have never been given antibiotics.</p>
<p><strong>Hormones and Antibiotics:</strong></p>
<p>The FDA banned the use of hormones &#8211; most notably diethylstilbestrol, or DES &#8211; in poultry in 1959, after they not only caused tragic health problems in consumers but also failed to stimulate growth in chickens. "Hormone free" is a misleading bit of marketing that suggests other egg producers are illegally dosing their birds.</p>
<p><strong>Kept in Cages</strong></p>
<p>Some hens are kept in battery cages; enclosures so small the animals can't spread their wings. Battery caged hens are crammed as many as six chickens into a cage at a time, leaving each bird with less personal space than a sheet of ordinary notebook paper. Critics say the battery system causes the spread of disease, requires the painful de-beaking of birds, and restricts natural bird behaviors, such as dusting or nesting.</p>
<p><strong>Have Access to Outside</strong></p>
<p>"Free Range" and "Free Roaming" are terms that bring to mind idyllic barnyard scenes. These labels, which are regulated by the USDA, may be used by a producer if their hens are allowed some access to the outdoors. This does not guarantee constant access, nor is there any specification of the size of the outdoor area (which is, of course, a penned area, not a range).</p>
<p><strong>Beaks Clipped</strong></p>
<p>Also known as debeaking, or beak trimming, is a process by which parts of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beak" title="Beak">beak</a> of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken" title="Chicken">chicken</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey_%28bird%29" title="Turkey (bird)">turkey</a> are trimmed. Many variations of debeaking are used. Most commonly, the beak is shortened permanently, with the lower beak somewhat longer than the upper beak. The goal of this is to reduce cannibalism in stressed-out bird populations, such as in crowded egg-laying hen houses.</p>
<p><strong>Forced Molted</strong></p>
<p>When light and temperature are manipulated so hens lay eggs more than normal.</p>
<p><strong>Omega-3 enriched</strong></p>
<p>Omega-3 is a polyunsaturated fatty acid considered crucial by some for developing brains and preventing heart disease and depression. Farmers boost the omega-3 content of their hens' eggs by adding ground flaxseed, algae, or even fish oil to the birds' feed.</p>
<p>My own kind choice is to stay informed, shop at the local farmers' market and ask questions, and someday, raise my own.</p>
<p>If you have any tips or insights into local egg farms, please do share!</p>
<p>For more egg carton terms, go to:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.pennlive.com/naturalliving/2007/06/eggs.html">http://blog.pennlive.com/naturalliving/2007/06/eggs.html</a></p>
<p><span class="left"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/imp/icon_amyg.jpg" /></span><em><strong>Amy Gotliffe</strong> is Conservation Manager at <a href="http://www.oaklandzoo.org" target="_blank" title="The Oakland Zoo">The Oakland Zoo</a>.</em></p>
<p><br clear="all" /></p>
<p> 37.7772 -122.166595</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/cage-free/" title="cage free" rel="tag">cage free</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/chickens/" title="chickens" rel="tag">chickens</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/debeaking/" title="debeaking" rel="tag">debeaking</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/des/" title="DES" rel="tag">DES</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/diethylstilbestrol/" title="diethylstilbestrol" rel="tag">diethylstilbestrol</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/eggs/" title="eggs" rel="tag">eggs</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/fda/" title="FDA" rel="tag">FDA</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/free-range/" title="free range" rel="tag">free range</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/kqed/" title="kqed" rel="tag">kqed</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/omega-3/" title="Omega-3" rel="tag">Omega-3</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/organic/" title="organic" rel="tag">organic</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/pbs/" title="pbs" rel="tag">pbs</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/poultry/" title="poultry" rel="tag">poultry</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/quest/" title="QUEST" rel="tag">QUEST</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/turkey/" title="turkey" rel="tag">turkey</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/usda/" title="USDA" rel="tag">USDA</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/05/21/quest-for-a-kind-egg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.7772000 -122.1665950</georss:point><geo:lat>37.7772000</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.1665950</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/05/blog_egg.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/05/blog_egg.jpg" medium="image" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/imp/icon_amyg.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

