<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED QUEST &#187; lighting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/lighting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest</link>
	<description>Explore science, nature and environment stories from Northern California and beyond with KQED’s multimedia series</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://science.kqed.org/quest/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>What Makes Us Conserve Energy? 6 Lessons from the Smart Grid</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/10/07/what-makes-us-conserve-energy-6-lessons-from-the-smart-grid/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/10/07/what-makes-us-conserve-energy-6-lessons-from-the-smart-grid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 01:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Sommer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart meter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science.kqed.org/quest/?p=25846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smart meters are providing consumers with hourly and daily energy use information. But does it inspire conservation?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_25851" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/10/Meter.jpg"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/10/Meter-300x169.jpg" alt="" title="Meter" width="300" height="169" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-25851" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A PG&amp;E SmartMeter on a Bay Area home. (Photo: Lauren Sommer)</p></div>
<p>Smart meters have arrived for many Californians. More than 11 million have been installed by electric utilities in the state, with PG&amp;E leading the way. The new meters digitally track a household's energy use. So, for the first time, we can see our daily and even hourly data online (with a one-day lag before it's posted).</p>
<p>Studies have shown that consumers reduce their energy use when they have access to this information. But as PG&amp;E and other utilities have discovered, raw energy data doesn't mean much to most of us (<a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/audio/in-a-sea-of-energy-data-utilities-try-to-inspire-conservation/">including me in this week's QUEST story</a>).</p>
<p>A number of clean tech start-ups and major corporations are jumping into this space, trying to bridge the gap between hardware (meter) and well, "soft"-ware (consumers). </p>
<p>Getting busy people to change their behavior is no simple task. So I spoke to two companies that have worked with PG&amp;E and other utilities on this problem. Both <a href="http://opower.com/">Opower </a>and <a href="http://www.silverspringnet.com/">Silver Springs Networks</a> have designed the web portals that consumers see when they log into their utility accounts. They're designed not just to make us understand, but to inspire us to use less energy in our daily lives. I asked Dan Yates of Opower and Eric Dresselhuys of Silver Spring Networks what lessons they've learned.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson 1: Keep Up with the Joneses </strong></p>
<p>You might think that saving the planet would be enough of a reason to guilt us into energy conservation. But it turns out that our competitive streak is a bigger motivator.</p>
<p>The companies' websites show customers how their energy use compares to similar houses in their neighborhood. Don't worry &#8211; they're not publishing exactly how much electricity the Smiths use down the street. But the companies say knowing how you compare to others is a powerful motivation.</p>
<p>"It's not shame," says Yates of Opower. "It is really just recognizing an addressable opportunity to reduce usage. If I have a $250 utility bill, I don't really know how much I can save. But as soon as I know that a similar home in my neighborhood is paying $150, suddenly I feel like I have an addressable gap of $100 that I want to pay attention."</p>
<p>It's called "normative comparison" in the behavioral science world. And Dresselhuys agrees. "People don't like to lose. People start to wonder why they use so much more than their neighbor does and they start to dig into it."</p>
<p>Opower is rolling out new social features later this year that allow customers to compare themselves to friends on Facebook. "It puts the information in a context that's relevant to people. We've seen the power of the neighbor comparison and we're taking it to the next level with the friend comparison," says Yates.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson 2: Provide Concrete Advice</strong></p>
<p>Once you get people's attention, they need specific recommendations to take action on – and those recommendations need to be doable, say Yates. "People don't want data, they want insights."</p>
<p> "I always joke that my mom is my litmus test. And I know that she would never spend a minute looking at raw energy data. But what she would love to find out is that her freezer is very energy intensive and it would be worth it to buy a new one," he says.</p>
<p>Opower is working with PG&amp;E to roll out a new web portal to customers by the end of the year. Using smart meter data, they can analyze a household's energy use and break it into four categories: heating, cooling, base load (like refrigerator and DVR) and everything else (like lighting and TV watching). </p>
<p>Heating and cooling makes up half of a home's energy use on average. Yates says reducing your heating and cooling load is one of the easiest ways to save energy and reduce your bill.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson 3: Get Information Out There</strong></p>
<p>"The average customer isn't getting up in the morning and checking their energy use data," says Yates. Emails, text messages and plain old snail mail are crucial for getting customers to pay attention.</p>
<p>Eric Dresselhuys says mobile devices, including iPhone apps, are making it much easier. "You can get a text if your electricity usage is getting high. Or the utility can send a message on peak days when they need customers to conserve energy," he says.</p>
<p>Letting customers know what their bill will be is also a good way to get their attention. "Today, getting your utility bill is like shopping for groceries all month long and never seeing a bill until the end of the month," he says.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson 4: Set a Goal</strong></p>
<p>Remember those gold stars in elementary school? It turns out we still like to be rewarded when we achieve something.</p>
<p>"What we see is that getting people to go after a goal, even 5%, has a big impact," says Yates. When they track a customer's progress towards a goal, Yates says it helps them save energy, no matter the size of the goal. "It's applicable even if you're at the very bottom of the pile and use a ton of energy," he says.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson 5: Tell People When They Do Well but Don't Overdo it</strong></p>
<p>Say you're super energy efficient, turning off lights and power strips in your house with unrelenting dedication. If your utility tells you that you're head and shoulders above everyone else, chances are you'll stop trying so hard.  "This was a concerning outcome of earlier studies we did," says Yates. </p>
<p>"It's been seen in other scenarios. There was an anti-drinking campaign called ‘two beers is enough' at college campuses. There were non-drinkers who started thinking ‘if the campus is telling me two is enough, maybe I should drink more beer," he says.</p>
<p>"We've designed our reports so everyone has a goal in front of them," says Yates. It's always good to reward people for doing a good job, but Yates says they stay away from telling people if they're achieving way above expectations.</p>
<p><strong>Lesson 6: The Smart Grid is Probably Smarter without Consumers</strong></p>
<p>Home automation, as its known, is almost a holy grail for utilities. If technology can take care of energy conservation, then customers don't have do remember to do it.</p>
<p>The idea is that on peak days, when the utility needs to conserve energy, it can send a message to a customer's smart meter. The meter is connected to the thermostat over a Home Area Network, so the thermostat adjusts itself by a few degrees to conserve electricity. Customers can opt-out anytime.</p>
<p>Both the carrot and stick in this case comes in the form of a varied pricing plan. During hot afternoons or so-called "peak events," electricity would be more expensive. So the customer has the potential to save money by shifting their energy use later in the evening when power is cheaper.</p>
<p>Dresselhuys says they saw the potential of this in a pilot with Oklahoma Gas &amp; Electric customers. "The more automation in the home, the higher the level of savings. Using that home automation about doubles the amount of money they can save," he says.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://kqed02.streamguys.us/anon.kqed/slideshow/Radio6-2-EnergyBehavior2//_files/iframe.html?noscale=640x423" width="640" height="423" scrolling="no" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/conservation/" title="conservation" rel="tag">conservation</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/electricity/" title="electricity" rel="tag">electricity</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/energy/" title="energy" rel="tag">energy</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/heating/" title="heating" rel="tag">heating</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/home/" title="home" rel="tag">home</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/lighting/" title="lighting" rel="tag">lighting</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/power/" title="power" rel="tag">power</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/smart-grid/" title="smart grid" rel="tag">smart grid</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/smart-meter/" title="smart meter" rel="tag">smart meter</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/10/07/what-makes-us-conserve-energy-6-lessons-from-the-smart-grid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.735969208590504 -122.4371337890625</georss:point><geo:lat>37.735969208590504</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.4371337890625</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/10/Meter.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/10/Meter.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Meter</media:title>
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/10/Meter.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Meter</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">A PG&#38;E SmartMeter. (Photo: Lauren Sommer)</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/10/Meter-300x169.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Me and CFLs Haven&#039;t Parted Ways Just Yet</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/09/19/me-and-cfls-havent-parted-ways-just-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/09/19/me-and-cfls-havent-parted-ways-just-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gunshinan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCHT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kqed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light bulb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QUEST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some readers may have noted that I declared my allegiance to light-emitting diodes LEDs, in a recent blog, since they are potentially much more energy efficient than CFLs. But we'll have to live with CFLs until LEDs become more cost effective...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Do compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) really save energy?</strong></p>
<p><span class="left"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/09/cfl2.jpg" /></span>When you replace incandescents with CFLs, you use less electricity for lighting, but you use more energy for heating your home in the winter, since hot burning incandescents&#8211;which produce a lot more heat than light&#8211;decrease the heating load. This is called the take-back effect. Anil Parekh, who does research for Natural Resources Canada, and his colleagues, studied the take-back effect. They wanted to know if CFLs really saved energy in a home over the course of a year.</p>
<p>The Canada study, which took place at the Canadian Center for Housing Technology (CCHT)&#8211;two identical homes that allow researchers to compare different technologies&#8211;showed that even in heating dominated climates, such as in Fairbanks, Alaska, you save energy overall by swapping out incandescents with CFLs. And in cooling climates, such as in Los Angeles, you save on lighting electricity and there is an added bonus (as if Southern Californians deserved it) you use less to cool your home in the summer, since cool CFLs, which put out 90% less heat than incandescents, are not adding to your cooling load. </p>
<p>Some readers may have noted that I <a href="www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2008/08/22/rip-for-cfls-leds-to-light-our-future/">declared my allegiance to light-emitting diodes</a> (LEDs), in a recent blog, since they are potentially much more energy efficient than CFLs. But we'll have to live with CFLs until LEDs become more cost effective&#8230; kind of like driving my pretty-fuel-efficient 1997 Geo Prizm into the ground before investing in a newer, hybrid car, or until I quit driving. It takes a lot of energy to make a hybrid car. </p>
<p>Sometimes the most efficient car, or appliance, or light bulb, is the one that's already been made.</p>
<p> 37.8686 -122.267</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/ccht/" title="CCHT" rel="tag">CCHT</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/cfl/" title="cfl" rel="tag">cfl</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/energy/" title="energy" rel="tag">energy</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/kqed/" title="kqed" rel="tag">kqed</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/led/" title="LED" rel="tag">LED</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/light-bulb/" title="light bulb" rel="tag">light bulb</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/lighting/" title="lighting" rel="tag">lighting</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/quest/" title="QUEST" rel="tag">QUEST</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/09/19/me-and-cfls-havent-parted-ways-just-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.8686000 -122.2670000</georss:point><geo:lat>37.8686000</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.2670000</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/09/cfl2.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/09/cfl2.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>R.I.P. for CFLs? LEDs to Light our Future</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/08/22/rip-for-cfls-leds-to-light-our-future/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/08/22/rip-for-cfls-leds-to-light-our-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gunshinan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeenergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kqed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light bulb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light emitting diode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been a cheerleader for compact fluorescent lamps (CFL) in this blog and will abandon the technology in a millisecond. When it comes to technology, my loyalties are short lived.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/08/9_watts.jpg" /></span>I've been a cheerleader for compact fluorescent lamps (CFL) in this blog and will abandon the technology in a millisecond. When it comes to technology, my loyalties are short lived. I'm writing this from Asilomar State Park in Pacific Grove, California, during the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) bi-annual Summer Study on energy use in buildings. Early in the week, the plenary speaker and a 2008 ACEEE Champion of Energy Efficiency, Philips Lighting's Kevin Dowling, Vice President for Innovation in Solid State Lighting, turned my head from CFLs to light emitting diodes (LEDs), my new little darling, hero, and true lighting love.</p>
<p>Philips Lighting was the first manufacturer to commercialize CFL bulbs in the 1970s, and has long been an innovator, as well as being the largest manufacturer of lighting products in the world. "We aren't even near the limits to this technology," said Dowling. Technically, solid-state lighting, or LED lighting, is ready to be the next big thing after CFLs. The challenge that remains is making LED lighting affordable and ubiquitous. That is a challenge when you consider that today's incandescents work in 1880s-style fixtures. Dowling proved it in a backroom of the Smithsonian in Washington D.C. And in the progressive Pacific Northwest, after 15 years on the market, CFLs have achieved only 8% market penetration.</p>
<p>But LEDs are an easy sell. Compared to incandescent lights, which produce 10–12 lumens per watt (lpw), and fluorescents, which produce 90-100 lpw, the best LEDs produce approximately 100 lpw, have the potential to reach the 150–200 lpw level, can last 35 years and don't release any mercury into the environment. History has shown that the cost of LED technology has decreased, while performance has increased&#8211; both exponentially. Dowling expects LED lighting performance to continue increasing 35% per year while the price decreases about 20% per year, and that in 24-36 months LED lighting will reach the level of linear fluorescent lights in light output per watt of energy use.</p>
<p>LEDs have evolved from mostly lighting that attracts attention to lighting that illuminates. LEDs can produce a range of color temperatures, from cool to warm. It has been installed in the Old North Church in Boston to rave reviews from the curators of the historic church. Legislation is supporting the evolution of the lighting technology. Legislation and guidelines will raise lighting efficacy to at least 45 lpw by 2020, according to Dowling, making LEDs an easy choice.</p>
<p>Goodbye CFLs, it was good while it lasted.</p>
<p> 37.8686 -122.267</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/cfls/" title="cfls" rel="tag">cfls</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/conservation/" title="conservation" rel="tag">conservation</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/energy/" title="energy" rel="tag">energy</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/homeenergy/" title="homeenergy" rel="tag">homeenergy</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/kqed/" title="kqed" rel="tag">kqed</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/led/" title="LED" rel="tag">LED</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/light-bulb/" title="light bulb" rel="tag">light bulb</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/light-emitting-diode/" title="light emitting diode" rel="tag">light emitting diode</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/lighting/" title="lighting" rel="tag">lighting</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/mercury/" title="mercury" rel="tag">mercury</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/pbs/" title="pbs" rel="tag">pbs</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/08/22/rip-for-cfls-leds-to-light-our-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.8686000 -122.2670000</georss:point><geo:lat>37.8686000</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.2670000</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/08/9_watts.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2008/08/9_watts.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

