<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KQED QUEST &#187; crater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/crater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest</link>
	<description>Explore science, nature and environment stories from Northern California and beyond with KQED’s multimedia series</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://science.kqed.org/quest/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Asteroid 2005 YU55 Scores!</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/11/04/asteroid-2005-yu55-scores-three-points/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/11/04/asteroid-2005-yu55-scores-three-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burress</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2005 YU55]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asteroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicxulub]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ejagham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near Earth Object]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science.kqed.org/quest/?p=26677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On November 8th, at 3:28 PM PST, the asteroid "2005 YU55" will pass by the Earth at a distance of just over 200,000 miles, or about 40,000 miles within the Moon's orbit. Fortunately, the asteroid's trajectory is well known, and poses no threat to us (at this time).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_26681" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 650px"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/11/04/asteroid-2005-yu55-scores-three-points/asteroid20100429-640/" rel="attachment wp-att-26681"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/11/asteroid20100429-640.jpg" alt="Asteroid 2005 YU55 - Credit NASA/Cornell/Arecibo" title="Asteroid 2005 YU55 - Credit NASA/Cornell/Arecibo" width="640" height="360" class="size-full wp-image-26681" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Asteroid 2005 YU55 - Radar image taken in 2010 - Credit NASA/Cornell/Arecibo</p></div>On November 8th at 3:28 PM PST the asteroid "2005 YU55" will pass by the Earth at a distance of just over 200,000 miles, or about 40,000 miles within the Moon's orbit.  This is a relatively close pass for an asteroid, like a football-stadium-sized football making a field goal through the posts of the Earth and the Moon.  Fortunately for us, there will be no touchdown….</p>
<p>At about 1,300 feet across, this roughly spherical, charcoal-black space rock would give us quite a wallop if it were to hit the Earth.  A bit larger than a typical football stadium (including a bit of the parking lot), if this asteroid were to strike Earth's ocean a powerful tsunami result, and if it struck land, a city-sized hole in the ground.  Not to mention a lot of fireworks.  </p>
<p>Fortunately, the asteroid's trajectory is well known, and poses no threat to us (at this time).</p>
<p>Asteroids and comets that can come close to the Earth—<a href="http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news171.html">Near Earth Objects</a>, or NEOs—have been a concern to life on Earth since it began.  From the end of the "era of heavy bombardment," when the young Earth endured frequent impacts by asteroids and comets, large and small, debris leftover from the formation of our Solar System still meets up on occasion with our planet.  Craters from past large impacts can be found today, camouflaged by millennia or eons of erosion, sedimentation, and tectonic activity—Earth's scar-healing processes.  </p>
<p>The crater left by a 10-mile-sized asteroid (that would be the stadium, parking lot, and the surrounding major metropolitan area) believed to have contributed to the demise of the dinosaurs lies hidden and buried at the tip of the Yucatan Peninsula:  the <a href="http://miac.uqac.ca/MIAC/chicxulub.htm">Chicxulub crater</a>.  (No, Chicxulub is not an all-women car service station….)  Other craters masquerade as round lakes and other landscape sculptures. </p>
<p>And some are quite candidly impact craters, like "<a href="http://www.meteorcrater.com/" title="Meteor Crater, Arizona">Meteor Crater</a>" near Winslow Arizona.  When I was in the Peace Corps in Cameroon, my house was 2 kilometers from a round lake that is apparently a meteorite crater. (That's Lake Ejagham; <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=lake+ejagham,+cameroon&amp;hl=en&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=43.25835,71.894531&amp;vpsrc=0&amp;hnear=Ejagham+Lake&amp;t=h&amp;z=12" title="Lake Ejagham, Cameroon">check it out</a> at 5.750000 degrees north latitude and  8.987778 degrees east longitude.)  Lake Ejagham is about a kilometer in diameter and 60 meters deep (not counting sediment infill).  The meteorite that created it wasn't nearly that big—probably the size of a very small house….</p>
<p>Now imagine an object the size of asteroid 2005 YU55 striking Earth, land or sea.  It wouldn't cause our demise—except for unfortunate bystanders—but it would create havoc around ground zero.  </p>
<p>And even though 2005 YU55 will not hit the Earth on November 8, all NEOs that pass that close (within the Moon's orbit) are considered near misses, and are scrutinized by the "eyes of the Earth":  radio dishes and optical telescopes across the planet.  </p>
<p>Chabot's own <a href="http://www.chabotspace.org/asteroid-search.htm" title="Chabot Asteroid Search Program">NEO observing team</a> will aim the eye of our 36-inch telescope, Nellie, on the asteroid and measure its trajectory, contributing to our knowledge of this particular NEO's orbit and improving our ability to predict its future passes. </p>
<p>This time, it's a mere field goal.  </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/2005-yu55/" title="2005 YU55" rel="tag">2005 YU55</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/asteroid/" title="asteroid" rel="tag">asteroid</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/chicxulub/" title="chicxulub" rel="tag">chicxulub</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/crater/" title="crater" rel="tag">crater</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/ejagham/" title="ejagham" rel="tag">ejagham</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/meteor/" title="meteor" rel="tag">meteor</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/meteorite/" title="meteorite" rel="tag">meteorite</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/near-earth-object/" title="Near Earth Object" rel="tag">Near Earth Object</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/11/04/asteroid-2005-yu55-scores-three-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.804766 -122.178982</georss:point><geo:lat>37.804766</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.178982</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/11/asteroid20100429-640.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/11/asteroid20100429-640.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Asteroid 2005 YU55 - Radar image taken in 2010 - Credit NASA/Cornell/Arecibo</media:title>
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/11/asteroid20100429-640.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Asteroid 2005 YU55 &#8211; Radar image taken in 2010 &#8211; Credit NASA/Cornell/Arecibo</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">Asteroid 2005 YU55 - Radar image taken in 2010 - Credit NASA/Cornell/Arecibo</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/11/asteroid20100429-640-300x169.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opportunity&#039;s Endeavour</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/09/23/opportunitys-endeavour/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/09/23/opportunitys-endeavour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burress</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curiosity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endeavour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opportunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science.kqed.org/quest/?p=24873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NASA's Opportunity rover has reached the goal of its three-year slog across the landscape of Mars!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_24874" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 633px"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/09/23/opportunitys-endeavour/endeavour-crater/" rel="attachment wp-att-24874"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/09/endeavour-crater.jpg" alt="Opportunity&#039;s Three Year Trek-Victoria to Endeavour Crater" title="Opportunity&#039;s Three Year Trek-Victoria to Endeavour Crater" width="623" height="360" class="size-full wp-image-24874" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Endeavour Crater; Credit: NASA, Google Earth</p></div>Who’d’ve thought back in 2004, when NASA’s twin Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity set wheels on Martia-firma, that one would still be roving nearly eight years later? </p>
<p>Who would have imagined three years ago, when the already veteran Opportunity set forth from its two-year prospecting site at Victoria Crater on a long march to the much larger Endeavour Crater, that the Fates would actually NOT stop this Energizer-Bunny dead in its tracks?</p>
<p>Okay, enough jaw-dropping incredulity.  Some things CAN be built to last….</p>
<p>About three weeks ago,<a href="http://marsrover.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20110901a.html"> Opportunity reached the rim </a>of the 14-mile wide Endeavour Crater, after clocking nearly 21 miles since its landing seven and a half years ago.  By Earth-rover standards, that’s about one round trip to work and home again for me, and about 25 minutes of my time—but Opportunity’s commute is a far greater feat, alone on another world, long minutes away even by radio waves, no service garages for maintenance, no fuel stations other than the daily dose of energy doled out by the Sun.  </p>
<p>One of the first things Opportunity did upon reaching the rim of the giant crater, after taking some pictures to give us the lay of the land, was to examine some rocks.  After all, more than anything else, the Mars Exploration Rovers are geologists, or rock hounds, sent to tell us about the Martian environment, today and in the past, through the chemical makeup and stratigraphy of the rocks and soil.</p>
<p>Data from orbital spacecraft have shown that the materials at the rim of Endeavour may date back to early in Martian history, making for fertile ground in Opportunity’s quest to uncover clues to the planet’s past.  Evidence for the presence of clay minerals, possibly formed under wet conditions favorable to life, has been brought to light—which really adds some excitement to the rover’s rock hounding exploits to come.</p>
<p>On Opportunity’s approach to the crater rim, it spotted in the distance unusual outcroppings, and a “shelf” of what looks like sedimentary rock with inclusions of material that may have been deposited by water action.  </p>
<p>Water water water, the watch-words of Martian exploration for many years.  Where there is, or was, water, perhaps there is, or was, some form of life.  And while the Mars Exploration Rovers weren’t designed to look for signs of life directly, their larger, better equipped descendant, <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/index.html">Curiosity</a>, to be launched in November, is.  Curiosity, do tell…. </p>
<p>As a child I liked to imagine what it would be like to land on and walk about the surface of Mars.  Mind you, back then we had no images from Mars’ surface—not until 1976 when Viking landed.  We had low-res images taken from space, and plenty of science fiction sound stage backdrops and sets from various TV shows and films (and a Mars stand-in, Death Valley, in Robinson Crusoe on Mars).  </p>
<p>Opportunity still appears to be in good shape, so the odyssey of its exploration seems to have a good chance of delivering yet another episode of the <em>Life (?) and Times of Mars</em>….</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/crater/" title="crater" rel="tag">crater</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/curiosity/" title="curiosity" rel="tag">curiosity</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/endeavour/" title="endeavour" rel="tag">endeavour</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/mars/" title="mars" rel="tag">mars</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/mer/" title="mer" rel="tag">mer</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/nasa/" title="nasa" rel="tag">nasa</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/opportunity/" title="opportunity" rel="tag">opportunity</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/rover/" title="rover" rel="tag">rover</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2011/09/23/opportunitys-endeavour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.818226 -122.180313</georss:point><geo:lat>37.818226</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.180313</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/09/endeavour-crater.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/09/endeavour-crater.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Opportunity&#039;s Three Year Trek-Victoria to Endeavour Crater</media:title>
		</media:content>
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/09/endeavour-crater.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Opportunity's Three Year Trek-Victoria to Endeavour Crater</media:title>
			<media:description type="html">Opportunity's Three Year Trek-Victoria to Endeavour Crater</media:description>
			<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2011/09/endeavour-crater-292x169.jpg" />
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Every Little Bit Counts</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2010/11/05/every-little-bit-counts/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2010/11/05/every-little-bit-counts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 16:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burress</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lroc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telescope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=10147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever tried to count the stars in the sky on some clear, lazy night, or the kind that fall from the sky during a meteor shower? How about craters on the Moon, or distant galaxies in deep space? If you like this kind of work, there is a job for you! Several, in fact….]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2010/11/lro-moon.jpg" /><em>Counting craters on a Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter image <br />of the Moon's surface. NASA/LRO</em></span></p>
<p>Ever been out on a clear, lazy night and tried to count the stars&#8211;or the kind that fall from the sky during a meteor shower? How about craters on the Moon, or distant galaxies in deep space?</p>
<p>If you like this kind of work, there is a job for you! Several, in fact…. </p>
<p>In this day of the Internet and electronic databases, our ability to store, process, share, and, yes, be overwhelmed by information is greater than ever before.  In fact, our ability to analyze data is only outmatched by our capacity to acquire it—which offers some pleasing challenges:  buried in the riches of data of our Universe that we are piling up around us, there is plenty of opportunity for just about anyone to grab a shovel and dig in, sharing in the adventure of exploration of the Universe around us!</p>
</p>
<p>Okay, that was the sales pitch, here are some details. </p>
<p>Count some stars! Subject: stars visible to the naked eye; what's being investigated: the impact of urban <a href="http://www.darksky.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=118976&amp;orgId=idsa">light pollution </a>on our access to the simple wonders of the night sky.  Every year, Windows to the Universe conducts the Great Worldwide Star Count citizen science project, enabling anyone who can look up at the night sky and count some of the stars there to participate in real science.  We're already into the Count, which runs this year from October 31st through November 12th.  For details on how to participate, <a href="http://www.windows2universe.org/citizen_science/starcount/index.html">check out their website</a>.</p>
<p>Results from the Great Worldwide Star Count are presented in a global map showing the "limiting magnitude" from thousands of locations where citizen scientists observed.  The limiting magnitude is a measure of brightness of the faintest star that can be seen from a given location. </p>
<p>How about craters on the Moon? Looking at the Moon through a small telescope, you can count some of the largest craters—those that are typically at least a mile or so across.  By virtue of the powerful LROC camera on <a href="http://lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov/">NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter </a>(LRO), the surface of the Moon is rabidly being photographed to a level of detail that reveals craters as small as a foot and a half across! </p>
<p>Craters are a fantastically rich source of information regarding the history of our solar system, each one a record of a single meteoroid impact which, when examined in context with all the rest, allows scientists to forensically piece together the puzzle of the formation of the Moon and our region of the solar system.  </p>
<p>While there are estimated to be at least 300,000 lunar craters with diameters of about half a mile or greater on the side of the Moon facing the Earth, smaller craters are estimated into the millions, and microcraters are most likely uncountably common.  </p>
<p>This means science needs your help! And you can give it, at <a href="http://www.moonzoo.org/">Moon Zoo</a>.  Log onto the Moon Zoo website, register yourself as an official lunar explorer, and have at it, friend.  Examining LRO images of the Moon's surface, you will count and classify craters and boulders, and mark unusual and interesting lunar features, as you explore.  There are so many images that have been acquired by LRO that in many cases you will be the first person ever to lay eyes on the particular patches of the Moon you examine—you might even run across something remarkable, like a derelict lunar robot from the 1960s (it's happened!).  Best of all, your work will count, your data feeding into a growing database from Moon Zoo explorers all over the world. </p>
<p>A sibling site to Moon Zoo—<a href="http://www.galaxyzoo.org/">Galaxy Zoo</a>—lets you examine and classify galaxies imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope. And since there are millions upon millions of unclassified galaxies that have been caught in Hubble's telescopic net, you'll be covering unexplored territories of space and contributing to our planet's understanding of the Universe….</p>
<p>There's a lot of work to do out there, and the glittering treasure trove of data just keeps getting larger and larger—so get to work!</p>
<p> 37.8148 -122.178</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/astronomy/" title="Astronomy" rel="tag">Astronomy</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/count/" title="count" rel="tag">count</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/crater/" title="crater" rel="tag">crater</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/galaxy/" title="galaxy" rel="tag">galaxy</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/hubble/" title="hubble" rel="tag">hubble</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/light-pollution/" title="light pollution" rel="tag">light pollution</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/lro/" title="lro" rel="tag">lro</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/lroc/" title="lroc" rel="tag">lroc</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/moon/" title="moon" rel="tag">moon</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/nasa/" title="nasa" rel="tag">nasa</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/space/" title="space" rel="tag">space</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/star/" title="star" rel="tag">star</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/telescope/" title="telescope" rel="tag">telescope</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/zoo/" title="zoo" rel="tag">zoo</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2010/11/05/every-little-bit-counts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.8148000 -122.1780000</georss:point><geo:lat>37.8148000</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.1780000</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2010/11/lro-moon.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2010/11/lro-moon.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Producer&#039;s Notes: Asteroid Hunters</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/03/23/producers-notes-asteroid-hunters/</link>
		<comments>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/03/23/producers-notes-asteroid-hunters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Space Explorers (ASE)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asteroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chabot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minor planet center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near Earth Asteroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near Earth Object]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rusty Schweickart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=1800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 3rd, 2009 at 1:40PM GMT, just a mere month after we’d finished the Asteroid Hunters segment, an asteroid of up to 165 feet in diameter snuck up on us, coming within approximately 37,000 miles from a direct impact with Earth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/video/asteroid-hunters"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2009/03/blog_200dd45.jpg" alt="" /></a><em>A few weeks ago, this asteroid came really close to hitting Earth.</em></span>On March 3rd, 2009 at 1:40PM GMT, just a mere month after we'd finished the Asteroid Hunters segment, an asteroid of up to 165 feet in diameter <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/world/science/asteroid-plays-chicken-with-earth-20090303-8nge.html">snuck up on us</a>, coming within approximately 37,000 miles from a direct impact with Earth.  That's almost seven times closer than the distance to the Moon and about twice the distance of some communications satellites that orbit the earth.  </p>
<p>Called “2009 DD45”, the asteroid was estimated to be around the same size as the one that exploded in the atmosphere near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River in remote Siberia on <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/30jun_tunguska.htm">June 30th, 1908</a>, flattening 80 million trees across eight hundred square miles of remote forest. Of course, if an asteroid of this size were to hit a city or in an ocean offshore from a populated area, tens of thousands of people would likely die.  </p>
<p>Then, just as the last of the night sky observers were completing their collective sighs of relief, on March 17th, 2009 another Tunguska-class asteroid, 2009 FH, passed by about 53,000 miles from Earth.  Thankfully, neither of these asteroids actually hit us. But astronomers didn’t even observe 2009 DD45 until 4 days before its closest approach.  It's orbit was calculated and it was determined that it would miss the Earth.  But it's likely that asteroids of this size are fairly frequently buzzing by the Earth.  And until recently, most of them have been undetected.  </p>
<p>In 1998, NASA started the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceguard">Spaceguard Survey</a> which set out to discover 90% of those Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs) 1 km in diameter and larger. An impact by an asteroid this size would likely cause global destruction and an end to much of life as we know it so it’s definitely reassuring that 10 years after its inception, the Spaceguard Survey had found about 80% (CK) of them.  But unfortunately, once we’ve found them, there’s still no international concensus or infrastructure in place in how to deflect or destroy them. But the Survey is limited by its mandate to find those mass extinction-sized asteroids as well as by the size and sophistication of the telescopes that are dedicated to searching the skies.  </p>
<p>As former Apollo 9 astronaut, <a href="http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/schweickart-rl.html">Rusty Schweickart</a> said in a recent phone conversation, "in the process of finding the big ones, you also find a bunch of small ones, and the smaller ones are obviously far more numerous than the large ones."  But it will take many more resources and new telescopes to continue searching for and tracking the smaller ones.  And unfortunately, once we’ve found them, there's still no international consensus or infrastructure in place in how to deflect or destroy them.  Raising awareness and building alliances amongst governments and space agencies is Schweikart's current "mission".  He founded the<a href="http://www.b612foundation.org/"> B612 Foundation</a> and <a href="http://www.space-explorers.org/">Association of Space Explorers</a> to tackle these goals on different fronts.  </p>
<p>The message that I hope is conveyed with the Asteroid Hunters TV segment is that we are not immune from asteroid impacts here on Earth.  Rusty Schweikart puts it best in a portion of his interview that didn’t make it into the final program:  </p>
<p><em>"Well, asteroids and comets are good news and bad news, you know? But for them we wouldn’t be here, and on the other hand, if we don't actually take some action now, at some point we won’t be here anymore, because there's no question that we will be hit by asteroids, and we’ll probably be hit by,  we would be hit by comets as well. Unless, we use the technology that we have and the brains that we have in order to protect the Earth from asteroid impacts, and we can do that. We can basically now, with current technology, assure that no asteroid ever hits the Earth again. That can do any serious damage."</em><br />
-Rusty Schweikart</p>
<p>Here's a little exercise from Rusty that you can do to get a sense of  what we know today about exactly what's out there:</p>
<ul class="links">
<li>Go to: <a href="http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk">neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk</a>
<li>See two tables, the first table says "Recently Observed Objects" and the table below says "Objects not recently observed." You’ll notice in the bottom table that Apophis is the 4th one listed.
<li>Click on "Apophis". At the top you see a bunch of boxes, like the diameter at .27 km, or 270 meters.
<li>Down below that you see 3 lines, those are the 3 potential impacts. The first one is April 13, 2036. Go over to the right on that line you'll see the column "Impact Probability" is 2.3 x 10-5 – click on that. So there is the probability, 1 in 43,000 of that particular impact.
<li>Now if you go back to the main table you can do the same thing with every single one of those lines.
<li>Now go to the very top of the page and hit "Discovery Statistics." Scroll down to a blue and red graph "Known Near-Earth Asteroids".  This shows the discovery rate beginning back in 1980 going up to almost current time. Notice the knee in that curve in 1998 – that’s when the Spaceguard Survey began.
<li>Scroll down to table just below the graph and look across that table to the far right side, to see that a a total of 6166 NEOs (of ALL sizes) have been discovered.
</ul>
<p>Rusty concludes that, <em>"&#8230;what we really care about is not only the things that large, we care about things that can hurt us. Things that can hurt us go down to 40 to 45 meters or so. Instead of there being 940 of them, there are more like 600,000 of them. So the new charge for NASA, which they have so far ignored, is to find 90% of the objects 140 meters and larger by 2020. You can't reasonably set a goal to find everything down to 40 meters because it's just beyond the capability of telescopes and the money available. So NASA, working with Congress, set the goal at 140 meters. Now nevertheless, when you are looking for 140 meter objects, it’s going to take bigger telescopes than the ones to find a kilometer. Therefore we are going to find many many smaller objects as well. So 10 to 15 years from now, instead of that number on the far right hand column being 6000, it will be 1 million."</em></p>
<p><br clear="all"></p>
<p><span class="left"><a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/video/asteroid-hunters"><img src="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/tv_icon_light.gif" alt="" /></a></span>Watch the <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/video/asteroid-hunters">Asteroid Hunters</a> television story online.</p>
<p><br clear="all"></p>
<p> 37.819208 -122.181393</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/association-of-space-explorers-ase/" title="Association of Space Explorers (ASE)" rel="tag">Association of Space Explorers (ASE)</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/asteroid/" title="asteroid" rel="tag">asteroid</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/chabot/" title="chabot" rel="tag">chabot</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/comet/" title="comet" rel="tag">comet</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/crater/" title="crater" rel="tag">crater</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/impact/" title="impact" rel="tag">impact</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/jpl/" title="JPL" rel="tag">JPL</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/mass-extinction/" title="mass extinction" rel="tag">mass extinction</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/meteorite/" title="meteorite" rel="tag">meteorite</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/minor-planet-center/" title="minor planet center" rel="tag">minor planet center</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/nasa/" title="nasa" rel="tag">nasa</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/nea/" title="NEA" rel="tag">NEA</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/near-earth-asteroid/" title="Near Earth Asteroid" rel="tag">Near Earth Asteroid</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/near-earth-object/" title="Near Earth Object" rel="tag">Near Earth Object</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/neas/" title="NEAs" rel="tag">NEAs</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/neo/" title="neo" rel="tag">neo</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/neos/" title="NEOs" rel="tag">NEOs</a>, <a href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/tag/rusty-schweickart/" title="Rusty Schweickart" rel="tag">Rusty Schweickart</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2009/03/23/producers-notes-asteroid-hunters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<georss:point>37.8192080 -122.1813930</georss:point><geo:lat>37.8192080</geo:lat><geo:long>-122.1813930</geo:long>
		<media:thumbnail url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2009/03/blog_200dd45.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/2009/03/blog_200dd45.jpg" medium="image" />
		<media:content url="http://science.kqed.org/quest/files/images/tv_icon_light.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

