<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HERS It Is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/06/27/hers-it-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/06/27/hers-it-is/</link>
	<description>Explore science, nature and environment stories from Northern California and beyond with KQED’s multimedia series</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Gunshinan</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/06/27/hers-it-is/#comment-11515</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gunshinan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=669#comment-11515</guid>
		<description>I did take a look at the link you suggested, Kurt. Let&#039;s hope a few bad apples don&#039;t spoil the whole bunch. I just got a letter from a reader of Home Energy raving about his positive experience with HERS and RESNET. I think that is most typical.

Pat, whether or not 48 is a good score depends on which scoring system your rater used. In the newer system, where &quot;0&quot; means you have a zero-energy house and &quot;100&quot; is a standard new house, 48 is pretty darn good. In the old system, the higher the number the better the house. A 48 would be a pretty poor score. I&#039;m hoping you had your home rated under the newer system!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did take a look at the link you suggested, Kurt. Let's hope a few bad apples don't spoil the whole bunch. I just got a letter from a reader of Home Energy raving about his positive experience with HERS and RESNET. I think that is most typical.</p>
<p>Pat, whether or not 48 is a good score depends on which scoring system your rater used. In the newer system, where "0" means you have a zero-energy house and "100" is a standard new house, 48 is pretty darn good. In the old system, the higher the number the better the house. A 48 would be a pretty poor score. I'm hoping you had your home rated under the newer system!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/06/27/hers-it-is/#comment-11514</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=669#comment-11514</guid>
		<description>I have a HERS score of 48- how good did I do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a HERS score of 48- how good did I do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://science.kqed.org/quest/2008/06/27/hers-it-is/#comment-11516</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=669#comment-11516</guid>
		<description>Read about Energy Star fraud at:

http://www.topix.com/forum/blogs/T5B5PB4QTVSK9MG14/p6#lastPost</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read about Energy Star fraud at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.topix.com/forum/blogs/T5B5PB4QTVSK9MG14/p6#lastPost" rel="nofollow">http://www.topix.com/forum/blogs/T5B5PB4QTVSK9MG14/p6#lastPost</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

