What Does It Mean Being Green?

"Ginormous" House

First of all, I must de-confess. After making a rather dramatic confession of gross over-use of water in my last blog, it turns out the problem was not a moral failure after all, but rather a leak in the pipe carrying water from the street to our house. The leak has been fixed. But if you already extended forgiveness to me, I hope you don't mind that I'll count it towards future eco-sins.

Now on to other people's sins–at least it's a sin in my book–ginormous houses. (I've wanted to use the word "ginormous" since I found out it made it into the Oxford English Dictionary.) I recently had an e-mail conversation with someone writing a story about green homes for a national magazine. We discussed "green home," which I defined as an energy-efficient home with good indoor air quality that is comfortable, durable, water conserving, made of sustainable materials, and affordable to build and maintain. I now add to that list the quality of "passive survivability," meaning that the home is still livable during a blackout without the use of a generator or other outside power source. Notice that the word "ginormous," or even "big," are not on the list.

With some of the newer green home rating systems, I think that a big house should be penalized (say, for example, the home would lose points for being bigger than 2,500 square feet, with more square feet added depending on the number of occupants). A big, efficient home generally still uses more energy than an average home, and the "embodied energy" in the home– the energy that goes into creating the materials, such as wood, steel, and concrete– can be ginormous in a large home. I was disappointed to read in a recent issue of Environmental Design and Construction that a 5,500 square foot home in Virginia was certified by Energy Star, EarthCraft Homes, and LEED for Homes, three very respectable organizations and rating systems.

Some green building advocates tell me that a large efficient home is better than a large inefficient one. Also, to be fair, many new green technologies that eventually become mainstream start out in big, high-end homes, because wealthy people have the wherewithal to experiment with new technologies. It's like NASA giving us Tang and medical advances. I don't know, maybe I'm just jealous.

Jim Gunshinan is Managing Editor of Home Energy Magazine. He holds an M.S. in Bioengineering from Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, and a Master of Divinity (MDiv) degree from University of Notre Dame.

Tags: , , ,
  • http://www.anyhere.com/gward Greg Ward

    Nice blog. I'm still looking for a ginormous apartment, which seems more important since I have a friend with his wife and three kids coming to visit. Any tips for how to gain cooperation from an owner or landlord to improve some of the basics in an apartment (insulation, weather-stripping, etc.)? My landlord is pretty good about such things, but I know a lot who aren't. Even changing to compact fluorescents on exterior fixtures would be a start.

  • Jim Gunshinan

    Hi Greg. I take it that you pay the electric bills in your apartment and not your landlord? It's hard to get a landlord to do much if the tenant has to suffer the expense of no insulation or energy-hogging lights. In some subsidized housing, the landlord is given so much money each month for each unit, and has to pay utilities out of that set amount. Those landlords are motivated and tend to upgrade their apartments continually, especially if new energy-saving appliances come with rebates.

    Good luck with your guests. Like I wrote in my last post, the number of people in a house should count towards the house's efficiency.

  • Jim Gunshinan

    We judge a light bulb by how many lumens of light it puts out per watt. Maybe we should judge the efficiency of a house by how many people it shelters in comfort per killowatt hour or BTU.

  • http://www.thelfactor.co.uk/ crash course

    I'm just so chuffed that ginormous is now in the dictionary! Big houses smack of conspicuous consumption – I bet there's garaging for more than 2 cars…

  • Pingback: QUEST Community Science Blog - KQED » How are BTU? Measuring green